SOP-014 / 2.1
Stability and BUD justification
Assigning a use period for the exact formula, packaging and conditions.
Procedure
- Compare the studied and local preparations: active, salt, strength, excipients, water, pH, process and container.
- Assess study quality and whether analysis distinguishes degradation. Preserved appearance alone does not demonstrate chemical stability.
- Assess chemical, physical and microbiological stability separately, preservative effectiveness where required, and in-use behaviour.
- Consider current jurisdictional requirements and material limitations. Do not automatically transfer a numerical BUD between sources or countries.
- In F-006 record the selected period, starting point, temperature, packaging, evidence and limitations. Calculate the actual date for each batch.
- Reassess after vehicle, supplier, process or container changes and temperature excursions. Do not extend expiry by relabelling without evidence.
Additional detail
This template uses defaults of revised USP <795>, official from 1 November 2023: unpreserved aqueous aw ≥0.60 up to 14 days at 2–8 °C; preserved aqueous up to 35 days at controlled room temperature or refrigeration when compatible; nonaqueous oral liquid aw <0.60 up to 90 days; other nonaqueous forms aw <0.60 up to 180 days, at controlled room temperature or compatible refrigeration. These are category ceilings, not demonstrated stability of each formula or Greek law. A shorter supported limit takes precedence. Do not assign 14 days at room temperature when refrigeration is incompatible.
The clock begins at compounding initiation. Commercial-component expiry remains a constraint. Compounded components generally constrain the final preparation to their shortest BUD; a specific modifier/vehicle exception needs evidence that final chemical, physical and microbiological quality is not adversely affected.
Insufficient evidence for critical stability: complete the assessment before release.
Related forms
Sources and references
- NAPRA — Model Standards for Pharmacy Compounding of Non-sterile PreparationsMarch 2018, clarification January 2022Sections 4–9Risk, personnel, facilities and QA; its historical BUD table is not used for current USP defaults2026-10-14
- NAPRA — Guidance Document for Pharmacy Compounding of Non-sterile PreparationsMarch 2018, clarification January 2022Sections 5, 6 and 7; master/batch records, delivery, qualityQuality-system implementation; historical BUD table not substituted for 2022 USP revision2026-10-14
- PIC/S — Guide to Good Practices for the Preparation of Medicinal Products in Healthcare EstablishmentsPE 010-4, 1 March 2014Chapters 1–9; Annex 2 (nonsterile liquids, creams, ointments)Professional quality-system framework; not automatic national legal adoption or certification2026-10-14
- USP — Compounding Standards and Beyond-Use Dates, 2022 updateNovember 2022, published by USP; public copy hosted by Mississippi Boardpp. 1–2; nonsterile tableRisk-based default categories; not product-specific stability or Greek law2026-10-14
- Illinois IDFPR — Nonsterile Compounding Self-Inspection ReportPublic regulatory checklist, accessed 2026-09-12pp. 15–16; USP <795> sections 10.1–10.5Temperature conditions and requirements for supported extension; jurisdiction-specific guidance2026-10-14
- USP — General Chapter <795> FAQsUpdated 1 November 2023; retrieved 14 October 2026Questions 52–66, especially 52, 54–56, 58–59, 61–64Publisher interpretation: optional formula-specific aw testing, initiation-date BUD, stock-component exceptions, exact-formula stability studies and antimicrobial-effectiveness testing. Not Greek law.2026-10-14
- USP — Compounding Standards <795> and <797>, USP scientific presentation2025 USP scientific presentation; NCPA-hosted public copySlides 12–15 (nonsterile BUD table and extension)Primary USP educational presentation confirming nonsterile category ceilings and storage columns; not a substitute for the full current chapter.2026-10-14