Final editorial decision
The wax prerequisite is fulfilled by an accepted lot of supplier-qualified pharmacopoeial anionic wax matched to the reference composition. In-house wax manufacture is not necessary to implement this monograph. The 35-day figure remains a conditional general ceiling, not experimental stability or an assigned batch BUD. Confirm final pH 5.7–6.3, homogeneity and chlorocresol suitability in the exact formulation. An aluminium tube requires a suitable internal lacquer. Apply the shortest supported limit, including the remaining BUD of any compounded base.
Required evidence
- Defined and approved supplier grade of anionic BP wax, with routine acceptance of the actual lot; accepted other ingredients and the exact reference formula/process.
- Justified finished-form category, defined container/storage, homogeneity and source-specific QC. For a preserved aqueous form, justify preservative suitability at the final pH and in the complete composition.
- For a compounded base, record its actual preparation date, release and remaining BUD. The new final mixture does not reset the base dating clock.
- Final pH within 5.7–6.3, suitable preservation and homogeneity. An aluminium tube requires suitable internal lacquer.
Closure criteria
- Close the research dependency on in-house wax by explicitly adopting the defined purchased pharmacopoeial grade. Incoming acceptance remains a routine requirement of actual compounding.
- Actual release requires the completed batch record, acceptable applicable QC and a signed BUD assessment applying the shortest supported limit.
- Do not apply a numerical default unless its category, compatible temperature and formulation suitability are supported. A new specific study is needed for extension or an unresolved physical/chemical concern, not merely to present a conditional default.
Scope
Final editorial decision dated 14 October 2026. This is not a certificate of laboratory results or actual batch release.
Sources and references
- USP General Chapter <795> FAQs, November 1 2023Questions 52, 60, 61, 62, 63; printed pp.11,14
- VVF manufacturer: Emulsifying WaxesProduct table: Vegarol EW 200; compare EW 100 and EW 300
- Croda Pharma manufacturer: Crodex A pharmaProduct description and pharmacopoeia compliance
- British Pharmacopoeia: Content Usage Licence for Individual UsersSections1,4 and5
REFERENCE FORMULA
Reference formula
Reference basis: 1000 g
| Ingredient | Source quantity | Scaled quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Emulsifying ointment BP | 300 g | — |
| Disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate | 25 g | — |
| Citric acid monohydrate | 5 g | — |
| Chlorocresol | 1 g | — |
| Freshly boiled and cooled purified water | q.s. ad 1000 g | — |
Prerequisite formulations
Documentation
Preparation description
Action and use
Specifications
Light
Air and oxidation
Water and solubility
Component of base CGR-BP-014: White Petrolatum: JP classifies the corresponding pure raw material as practically insoluble in water.
Component of base CGR-BP-014: Liquid Paraffin: JP classifies the corresponding pure raw material as practically insoluble in water. [3], [6], [7], [8]
Humidity
Temperature
pH and compatibility
pH 5.7-6.3 [1]
Other interactions
Ingredient-specific information
Component of base CGR-BP-014: White Petrolatum: raw-material water solubility is classified as practically insoluble by JP.
Component of base CGR-BP-014: Liquid Paraffin: raw-material water solubility is classified as practically insoluble by JP.
Component of base CGR-BP-015: Sodium lauryl sulfate: JP describes a clear or opalescent solution of 1 g in 10 mL water. [3], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]
Staff protection
Risk assessment
Check addition order, phase-temperature difference and uniformity after cooling. Phase separation can alter local strength and preservative partitioning; do not repair it arbitrarily with water or emulsifier.
For the local assessment record quantity per preparation, work frequency, duration of open handling, potential exposure routes and effectiveness of controls. These are assessment inputs; no fictitious final risk score is assigned.
For this procedure’s heating stage, check thermometer, heating method, duration and prevention of overheating/solvent loss. Completion of mixing does not establish cooling or complete homogenisation.
Release checkpoint: inspect aggregates, crystals, local texture differences and free liquid after completing the method. Record mixing geometry, batch size and actual temperatures; copying rpm to another mixer does not establish process equivalence.
Contains cetostearyl or cetyl alcohol, which can cause local skin reactions; include components of the selected base in the assessment.
Contains chlorocresol; allergic reactions are possible. [1], [12], [14], [16]
Compounding conditions
BUD rationale
Prerequisites
Equipment
Calibrated pH meter and suitable check buffers. [1]
Compounding method
Observations
Container and packaging
Quality control
Storage
Dispensing
Contains cetostearyl or cetyl alcohol, which can cause local skin reactions; include components of the selected base in the assessment.
Contains chlorocresol; allergic reactions are possible. [1], [16]
Labelling
External use
Quantity: ____ Batch: ____
Prepared: ____ Use by: ____
Patient / dose / frequency: ____
Storage: Aluminium tubes require a suitable internal lacquer.
Temperature for this batch BUD: ____
Contains cetostearyl or cetyl alcohol, which can cause local skin reactions; include components of the selected base in the assessment.
Contains chlorocresol; allergic reactions are possible. [1], [16]
final_decision
Independent Greek/English adaptation and organisation of facts from the cited source. This is not an official translation or publisher endorsement.
Sources and references
- British Pharmacopoeia 2016 — Buffered Cream2016PDF pp. 1–1; user-supplied BP extract; URL is publisher catalogue, not the licensed full monographmaster formula2026-09-10
- PN/L/PG/002/00 INDUMENTARIAΔιαθέσιμο κείμενο / Retrieved textPDF pp. 1–5general staff protection2026-09-10
- MHLW — Japanese Pharmacopoeia XVIII: Citric Acid HydrateJP XVIII, 2021; English textPrinted p. 769; Description; Containers and storageraw-material monograph2026-09-12
- ASHP — USP <795> Key Changes2023pp. 1–3: scope, water activity and staff precautionsprofessional guidance; not the licensed USP chapter2026-09-12
- Texas State Board of Pharmacy — adopted 22 TAC §291.131, nonsterile compoundingTexas Register, 7 June 2024Beyond-use dating: aw categories, 14/35/90/180 days, limits and extensionspublic regulatory implementation of USP <795> BUD framework; not Greek law2026-09-12
- MHLW — Japanese Pharmacopoeia XVIII: White PetrolatumJP XVIII, 2021; English textPrinted p. 1501; Description; Containers and storageraw-material monograph2026-09-12
- British Pharmacopoeia 2016 — Emulsifying Ointment2016PDF pp. 1–1; user-supplied BP extract; URL is publisher catalogue, not the licensed full monographmaster formula2026-09-10
- MHLW — Japanese Pharmacopoeia XVIII: Liquid ParaffinJP XVIII, 2021; English textPrinted p. 1477; Description; Containers and storageraw-material monograph2026-09-12
- MHLW — Japanese Pharmacopoeia XVIII: Sodium Lauryl SulfateJP XVIII, 2021; English textPrinted p. 1718; Description; Containers and storageraw-material monograph2026-09-12
- British Pharmacopoeia 2016 — Emulsifying Wax2016PDF pp. 1–2; user-supplied BP extract; URL is publisher catalogue, not the licensed full monographmaster formula2026-09-10
- Illinois IDFPR — Nonsterile Compounding Self-Inspection ReportPublic checklist, retrieved 12 September 2026pp. 15–16, Establishing beyond-use datesPublic regulatory implementation of USP <795>; not Greek law; general limits and requirements for extension2026-09-12
- NIOSH — Managing Hazardous Drug Exposures: Information for Healthcare Settings2023; DHHS (NIOSH) 2023-130Risk assessment; printed pp. 27–33, activity/formulation control tableWorkplace exposure, hierarchy of controls and activity-specific PPE; US government public-domain document2026-09-12
- USP — Compounding Standards and Beyond-Use Dates, 2022 updateNovember 2022, published by USP; public copy hosted by Mississippi Boardpp. 1–2; nonsterile tableRisk-based default categories; not product-specific stability or Greek law2026-09-12
- PIC/S — Guide to Good Practices for the Preparation of Medicinal Products in Healthcare EstablishmentsPE 010-4, 1 March 2014Chapters 1–9; Annex 2 (nonsterile liquids, creams, ointments)Professional quality-system framework; not automatic national legal adoption or certification2026-09-12
- USP — General Chapter <795> FAQsUpdated 1 November 2023Questions 52, 54–56, 60–62; PDF pp. 11–14Primary clarification of aw classification, extension prerequisites and compounded-component BUDs; not automatic Greek legal adoption2026-10-14
- EMA — Excipients in the labelling and package leaflet, Annex Revision 5Published 5 December 2025EN and EL worksheets: arachis oil, wool fat, cetostearyl/cetyl alcohol, chlorocresolCurrent primary excipient warnings; used as a scientific labelling reference, without claiming MAH obligations automatically apply to a compounded prescription2026-10-14
- VVF manufacturer: Emulsifying WaxesProduct table: Vegarol EW 200; compare EW 100 and EW 300Targeted prerequisite / publication decision; not batch result2026-10-14
- Croda Pharma manufacturer: Crodex A pharmaProduct description and pharmacopoeia complianceTargeted prerequisite / publication decision; not batch result2026-10-14
- British Pharmacopoeia: Content Usage Licence for Individual UsersSections1,4 and5Targeted prerequisite / publication decision; not batch result2026-10-14